On the Limitation of Attorney-Client Privilege: Statement of the Problem
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-4-167-173
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The article deals with the problems of restricting attorney-client privilege. Special attention is paid to the ethical side of the restriction of attorney-client privilege, taking into account the modern realities of the need to protect human life and health. The purpose of the study is to establish a balance of private and public interests when deciding on the limitation of attorney-client privilege. The subject of this study is the Russian legislation regulating the procedure for the preservation of attorney-client privilege, as well as the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation expressed in its rulings and resolutions. While writing the article, general scientific and special methods of cognition were used. The result of the research is that it is necessary to approach the issue of restricting attorney-client privilege very carefully and solve it taking into account the need to protect human life and health.
About the Authors
N. Yu. VolosovaRussian Federation
N. Yu. Volosova - Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law
13 Pobedy Avenue, Orenburg, 460000
O. D. Pronkina
Russian Federation
O. D. Pronkina - Assistant of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
References
1. Ariya S. V. Ob advokatskoi taine // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. - 1997. - № 2. - S. 37.
2. Bufetova M. Sh., Chamanov, V. V. K voprosu o svidetel'skom immunitete advokata // Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. - 2016. - № 6. - S. 16-24.
3. Voronov D. A. Zadachi advokata po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu v Sibirskom regione: sb. mat-lov mezhd. nauch. konf. (15-16 fevralya 2007 g.): v 2 ch. / SibYuI MVD Rossii; otv. red. S. D. Nazarov. - Ch. 2. - Krasnoyarsk, 2007. - S. 143-144.
4. Gerfanova E. I. Ugolovno-pravovoi immunitet advokata i zashchitnika // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universitete. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». - Kazan', 2019. - T. 161. - Kn. 1. - S. 182-190.
5. Petrukhin I. L. Lichnaya zhizn': predely vmeshatel'stva. - M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1989.
6. Pilipenko Yu. S. Otechestvennaya doktrina ob absolyutnosti ili otnositel'nosti advokatskoi tainy // Advokatskaya praktika. - 2009. - № 6. - S. 16-22.
7. Sibirtsev G. I. Teoreticheskie osnovy instituta advokatskoi tainy v ugolovnom protsesse // Advokatskaya praktika. - 2015. - № 6. - S. 27-33.
8. Smol'kova I. V. Aktual'nye problemy okhranyaemykh federal'nym zakonom tain v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. - M. : Yurlitinform, 2014.
9. El'kind P. S. Advokatskaya etika (nachalo) // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. - 1940. - № 3. - S. 17-20
Review
For citations:
Volosova N.Yu., Pronkina O.D. On the Limitation of Attorney-Client Privilege: Statement of the Problem. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2023;8(4):167-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-4-167-173