Bolsheviks’ Experience of Legal Regulation of Privatization
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-3-115-124
Abstract
This article discusses in detail the basic principles of legal regulation of the alienation of state property in accordance with the Civil Code of the RSFSR of 1922. The paper draws attention to the specifics of the alienation of state property caused by the state ideology of the Soviet state that existed at that time and, as a result, the principles of publicity of civil law. The legal mechanism for the alienation of state property and its continuity with the legislative norms on privatization in modern Russia is investigated. The presence of rich legal experience in regulating privatization in Russia is noted. The detailed analysis of certain norms of the Civil Code of the RSFSR of 1922, as well as annexes to it, was carried out and the main characteristics of the mechanism for the alienation of state property that existed on that historical stage were identified. The paper also presents a comparative legal analysis of the procedure for the alienation of state property as existed in the era of the formation of the Soviet state with the existing privatization procedure in the Russian Federation. The authors also made suggestions on optimizing the institution of privatization in modern Russian legislation on the basis of the reception of the norms established by the Civil Code of the RSFSR of 1922.
About the Authors
S. I. Faingersh
Department of City Property of the City of Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Head of the Division for Privatization of City Property
1 b., 21 1st Krasnogvardeysky Proezd, Moscow, 123112
D. D. Zubkov
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Assistant of the Department of Forensic Examination
2 b., 23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhni Novgorod, 603022
References
1. Вышинский Я. А. XVII съезд ВКП(б) и задачи науки социалистического права // Советское государство и право. – 1939. – № 3. – С. 1–26.
2. Друкер П. Ф. Эпоха разрыва: ориентиры для нашего меняющегося общества. – М. : «Вильямс», 2007.
3. Иоффе О. С. Избранные труды. – М. : СТАТУТ, 2009.
4. Ленин В. И. Полное собрание сочинений : в 55 т. – Т. 44. – М. : Изд-во политической литературы, 1970.
5. Новицкая Т. Е. Гражданский кодекс РСФСР 1922 года. – М. : ИКД «Зерцало-М», 2012.
6. Тяпкина Е. А. Способы приватизации // Гражданин и право. – 2003. – № 2. – C. 79–89.
7. Файнгерш С. И. Исторический опыт государственного управления государственным имуществом : монография. – Самара: Самарский Дом печати, 2006.
8. Файнгерш С. И., Зубков Д. Д. К вопросу о рецепции норм Гражданского кодекса РСФСР 1922 г. в сфере правовой защиты государственного имущества в Российской Федерации // Экономика. Право. Общество. – Том 6. – № 1 (25). – 2021. – С. 60–63.
9. Чубаров В. В. Проблемы правового регулирования недвижимости. – М.: Статут, 2006.
10. Williamson J. Did the Washington Consensus Fail? // Peterson Institute for International Economics. March 2, 2016. – URL: https://www.piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/did-washington-consensus-fail
Review
For citations:
Faingersh S.I., Zubkov D.D. Bolsheviks’ Experience of Legal Regulation of Privatization. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2023;8(3):115-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-3-115-124
Views:
92
Email this article 