About Errors and Contradictions in the Law
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2024-4-78-82
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of errors and contradictions in the law. The work talks about the ambiguities (contradictions) of the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authors come to the conclusion that this may be due to errors or inaccuracies made during the development of the normative act. The article examines obvious and hidden errors. It is emphasized that obvious errors do not require the use of any special methods of interpretation, with the exception of grammatical ones. The article examines in detail issues related to latent errors or contradictions using the example of civil law norms and their consequences. The methodological basis of the study was formed by modern general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge. The system method allowed to study complex issues of errors and contradictions on the example of the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in the unity of their social content and legal form. To study the features of errors and contradictions in the law, the following methods were used: analysis, deduction.
About the Authors
A. M. ErdelevskiyRussian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Рrofessor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
I. A. Garnaya-Ivanova
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
References
1. Комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации, части второй / под ред. О. Н. Садикова. – М., 1999.
2. Новоселова Л. А. К вопросу о возражениях в отношениях по поручительству // Меры обеспечения и меры ответственности в гражданском праве : сб. ст. / рук. авт. колл. и отв. ред. М. А. Рожкова. – М., 2010. – С. 129–154.
3. Панько К. К. Законодательные ошибки: теоретические аспекты // Наука и образование: хозяйство и экономика; предпринимательство; право и управление. – 2020. – № 2 (117). – С.105–108.
4. Сайфуллин Р. И. Тождественность долговой нагрузки основного должника и поручителя // Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. – 2022. – № 7. – С. 120–137.
5. Туранин В. Ю. Типология ошибок использования юридической терминологии в российском законодательстве // Российская юстиция. – 2009. – № 8. – С. 12–14.
Review
For citations:
Erdelevskiy A.M., Garnaya-Ivanova I.A. About Errors and Contradictions in the Law. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2024;9(4):78-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2024-4-78-82