Preview

ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY

Advanced search

About Some Issues of Compensation for Moral Damage

https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-4-14-22

Abstract

This article discusses a number of topical issues related to the use of such a method of protecting civil rights as compensation for moral damage. These issues are considered in connection with the analysis of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 33 “On the practice of application by courts of norms on compensation for moral damage” dated November 15, 2022. In particular, the issue of establishing the presumption of moral damage to the victim in the case of committing any offense against him is being considered. The issue of the possibility and conditions for the transfer of the right to compensation for moral damage in the order of universal and singular succession is also being considered. The work uses general scientific and special research methods, including the method of analysis and synthesis, generalization, formal-logical, systematic, comparative, etc. As a result of the analysis carried out in the work, it was concluded that there are sufficient grounds for applying, on the basis of existing legislation and materials of judicial practice, the presumption of causing moral harm to the victim in the event of any violation of his rights. Regarding the possibility of singular and universal succession with respect to the claim for compensation for moral damage, it is concluded that such succession is possible not only in relation to compensation for moral damage established by a court decision that has entered into force, but also by an out-of-court agreement on compensation for moral damage caused to the victim.

About the Author

A. M. Erdelevsky
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

A. M. Erdelevsky - Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the PRUE

 36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992 



References

1. Богданова И. С. К вопросу о возможности наследственного преемства на стороне должника в обязательстве по компенсации морального вреда // Юрист. – 2023. – № 5. – С. 17–23.

2. Губаева А. К., Ли Чжеву, Кратенко М. В. Базовый дискурс деликтного права в контексте разъяснений Верховного суда РФ о компенсации морального вреда // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. – 2023. – № 2. – Вып. 2 (60). – С. 257 – 284.

3. Егорова М. А., Кархалев Д. Н., Челышева Н. Ю., Комиссаров Г. А. Компенсация морального вреда: новые подходы в судебной практике // Юрист. – 2023. – № 5. – С. 2–9.

4. Зайцев О. В. Роль судебных решений (прецедентов) и судебной практики в регулировании общественных отношений // Вестник гражданского процесса. – 2018. – № 2. – С. 105–136.

5. Михайлова И. А. Обязательства вследствие причинения вреда жизни или здоровью. Комментарий к Постановлению Пленума Верховного суда РФ от 26 января 2010 г. № 1 // Цивилист. – 2010. – № 4.– С. 36–41.

6. Петрова А. С. Взыскание компенсации морального вреда при рассмотрении гражданских дел мировым судьей // Мировой судья. – 2023. – № 9. – С. 29–33.

7. Ягельницкий А. А. К вопросу о неразрывной связи права с личностью: преемство в праве требовать компенсации морального вреда и вреда, причиненного жизни или здоровью // Вестник гражданского права. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 60–91


Review

For citations:


Erdelevsky A.M. About Some Issues of Compensation for Moral Damage. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2023;8(4):14-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-4-14-22

Views: 841


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-118X (Print)