Liberalism: Ideology, Law, Political Regime
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-1-136-144
Abstract
The reason for the study was the discussion that continues to be lively in the scientific community and society about the means and methods of exercising political power that correspond to the modern understanding of the role of the state and law in people's lives. The relevance of the research is determined by the gap between the importance that philosophical, economic and political ideas that make up the essence of liberal ideology have for social development, and the level of their penetration into public consciousness and social practice. This contradiction is significantly reinforced by the versatile and tendentious criticism of liberal ideas, which further blurs their understanding and complicates their perception by the public authorities and the state regime. Today there is no doubt that the processes of public administration should be carried out under the control of society, therefore the influence of legal science on them, as a socially organized form of cognition of these processes, is difficult to overestimate. The author, considering the most general ideological foundations and fundamental principles of liberalism, concludes that they are of lasting value for overcoming existing social contradictions and achieving social well-being. The political regime mediates the ideological, ideological and legal spheres that characterize the cultural and value characteristics of society that influence the formation of political power in a given country. Liberalism as a political ideology connects the achievement of high quality of life indicators with the provision of freedom and equal opportunities for individuals to implement their legitimate actions aimed at embodying their ideas about their place in society. The degree of liberalization of society directly affects the methods of exercising political power, political freedom, the level of state violence in the country, respect for human and civil rights and freedoms.
Keywords
About the Author
V. V. AntonchenkoRussian Federation
PhD in Law, Deputy Chief,
27 Ajax Village, Vladivostok, Russian Island, 690922
References
1. Акашкин И. А. Формирование политико-правовой доктрины российского либерализма во второй половине XIX – начале XX в.: дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. – М., 2009.
2. Антонченко В. В. Право и общественные интересы // Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион: экономика, политика, право. – 2022. – Т. 24. – № 1. – С. 174–183.
3. Аристотель. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. – Т. 4 / под общ. ред. А. И. Доватура. – М.: Мысль, 1984.
4. Багдасарян В. Э., Сулакшин С. С. Современный фашизм: новые облики и проявления. – М.: Наука и политика, 2017.
5. Баженов С. А., Маликов Н. С. Качество жизни населения: теория и практика // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. – 2002. – № 10.
6. Белинский В. Г. Взгляд на русскую литературу 1846–1847 г. – М.: Директ-Медиа, 2012.
7. Бердяев Н. А. Философия неравенства. – М.: Институт русской цивилизации, 2012.
8. Берлин И. История свободы. Россия. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001.
9. Берлин И. Философия свободы. Европа. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001.
10. Голдберг Дж. Либеральный фашизм: пер. с англ. – М.: Рид Групп, 2012.
11. Грачев Н. И. Политические режимы: к вопросу о содержании понятия и основаниях классификации // Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 15–24.
12. Дворкин Р. М. Империя права: пер. с англ. – М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2020.
13. Золотницкий Е. В. Политический либерализм: историкo- и теоретико-правовые аспекты: дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2000.
14. Молчанов Д. В. Российский либерализм на рубеже XX–XXI вв.: традиции и современность: дис. ... д-р ист. наук. – М., 2004.
15. Пишун В. К. «Религия жизни» В. Розанова. – Владивосток: Изд-во Дальневосточного университета, 1994.
16. Фридман Д. Механизмы свободы: пособие по радикальному капитализму / пер. с 3-го изд. – М.: RUSTATE.ORG: Мысль, 2021.
17. Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек: пер. с англ. – М.: АСТ, 2007.
18. Хайек Ф. Судьбы либерализма в XX веке. – М.: ИРИСЭН, Мысль; Челябинск: Социум, 2009.
19. Хайек Ф. Дорога к рабству. – М.: Новое издательство, 2005.
20. Chwieroth J. M. The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975–79. – Kiernan, Ben: New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
21. Frieson K. The Political Nature of Democratic Kampuchea // Pacific Affairs. – 1988. – Vol. 61. – N 3. – P. 405–427.
22. Gentry K., Mason V. The Invisible Man: H. G. Wells and Human Rights During the Interwar Period // Human Rights Quarterly. – 2019. – N 41 (3). – P. 620–645.
23. Hensel D. G. 10 December 1948: HG Wells and the Drafting of a Universal Declaration of Human Rights // Peace Research. – 2003. – N 35 (1). – P. 93–102.
24. Venturelli S. Liberalizing the European Media. Politics, Regulation and the Public Sphere. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Review
For citations:
Antonchenko V.V. Liberalism: Ideology, Law, Political Regime. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2023;8(1):136-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2023-1-136-144