Recognition of Property Rights by Virtue of the Rules of the Acquisitive Prescription: Problems of Judicial Practice

The author of the article has conducted a study of the results of the practice of courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts in cases of acquisition of property rights by virtue of the rules of the acquisitive prescription for 2020–2021. The purpose of the analysis is to resolve the scientific hypothesis of the accounting of the legal positions developed by the Russian court practice on the project of acquisition prescription reform. The methodological basis of the study were analysis, synthesis, comparative legal, technical-legal, formal-logical methods. The author identifies the features and problems of the process of recognizing the ownership of residential premises, other real and movable property in the order of acquisition prescription. In addition, the author identified defects in the mechanism of property rights protection, which have a procedural nature, and proposed options for their elimination. As a result of the analysis, the author concludes the absence of consideration of the legal positions developed in the practice of courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts in cases of acquisition of property rights in the order of the acquisitive prescription.

1. Ламейкин Ю. А. Вещно-правовые иски в механизме защиты права собственности : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. – Краснодар, 2003.

2. Петухова Л. Г., Луц Е. Н. Негаторные иски и иные способы защиты прав собственника // Арбитражная практика. – 2010. – № 5.

3. Подшивалов Т. П. Негаторный иск: проблемы теории и практики: монография. – М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2019.

4. Потапенко Н. С. Способы защиты права собственности на недвижимую вещь // Российская юстиция. – 2010. – № 5. – С. 14–18.

5. Синицын С. А. Исковая защита вещных прав в российском и зарубежном гражданском праве: актуальные проблемы. – М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2015.