Features of the Application of Preventive Measures during the Investigation
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2022-2-77-84
Abstract
Abstract: the article examines the problems of legislative regulation and law enforcement practice in terms of the implementation of preventive measures during the preliminary investigation in the form of an inquiry. The author comes to the conclusion that the Criminal Procedure law explains in sufficient detail the procedure for the application of preventive measures during the preliminary investigation, however, when it comes to the implementation of preventive measures within the framework of the inquiry in full or abbreviated form, the legislator is silent, pointing only to the fact that within the framework of the investigation in the form of an inquiry, there are some features of the application of preventive measures. Such reservations, according to the author, only confuse the law enforcement officer, create conditions under which the application of preventive measures becomes impossible during the investigation. With concrete examples, the author illustrates, on the one hand, the imperfection of the current legislation, and on the other, the confusion of the interrogators in the implementation of such an important institution of criminal procedure. Based on the study of the materials of investigative and judicial practice, the theoretical views of domestic procedural scientists, the author formulates his own vision of ways to solve problems that arise in practice by developing proposals to improve the criminal procedure law in terms of the application of preventive measures during the investigation
About the Author
M. O. RumyantsevaRussian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department; Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
4 Komsomolsky Avenue, Lyubertsy, 140015
References
1. Гаврилов Б. Я. Дознание в сокращенной форме: законодательные мифы и реалии правоприменения // Электронный научный журнал Известия Иркутской государственной экономической академии. 2014. № 6.
2. Давлетов А. А., Политыко О. Е. Проблема исключительности применения меры пресечения к подозреваемому // Российская юстиция. – 2018. – № 6. – С. 50–52.
3. Кузьменко Е. С., Шайдуллина Э. Д. Подписка о невыезде или обязательство о явке: вопросы правоприменительной деятельности в отношении подозреваемого // Современное уголовно-процессуальное право – уроки истории и проблемы дальнейшего реформирования. – 2021. – Т. 1. – № 1 (3). – С. 223–231.
4. Насонова И. А., Зотова М. В. Применение мер процессуального принуждения при производстве дознания в сокращенной форме // Юридический вестник Самарского университета. – 2017. – Т. 3. – № 4.
5. Научно-практический комментарий к Уголовно-процессуальному кодексу Российской Федерации (постатейный) / отв. ред. Л. А. Воскобитова. – М. : Российская газета, 2015.
6. Семенцов В. А., Науменко О. В. Обеспечение прав личности при производстве дознания : монография. – М. : Юрлитинформ, 2016.
7. Торовков А. А. Некоторые особенности применения мер процессуального пресечения при производстве дознания в сокращенной форме // Вестник Барнаульского юридического института МВД России. – 2014. – № 1.
Review
For citations:
Rumyantseva M.O. Features of the Application of Preventive Measures during the Investigation. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2022;(2):77-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2022-2-77-84