A Philosophical and Legal Analysis of the Specifics of Female Pedophilia (Paraphilia) in the Context of Modern Medical, Psychological and Legal Paradigms
https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2026-1-114-121
Abstract
This study examines the philosophical and legal implications of female pedophilia, which is defined in this paper as a specific form of paraphilia. The author highlights a common misconception in society that equates pedophilia exclusively with male sexual abuse of children. However, empirical data show that male pedophiles often suffer from erectile dysfunction, particularly due to somatic conditions such as diabetes. In some cases, erectile dysfunction may act as an etiological factor, triggering the choice of a child as a sexual object, although penetration may be absent. The article argues that an erect male genital organ is not a prerequisite for the full spectrum of objective manifestations of pedophilia. Currently, female pedophilia generally remains outside the scope of public discourse, creating the illusion of its absence. Based on the results of the analysis, the author formulates two key conclusions: first, the factors contributing to the emergence of female pedophilia are identified; second, the reasons for the insufficient public awareness of this problem, despite the existence of documented cases of crimes committed by women, are analyzed.
Keywords
About the Author
V. A. SerednevRussian Federation
Lecturer of the Department of History, Social Studies and Law of Arzamas Branch.
39 K. Marks Str., Arzamas, 607220
References
1. Бахтадзе Т. Р., Смирнова О. М., Жуков А. О. Психоэмоциональные расстройства при некоторых эндокринных заболеваниях и сахарном диабете // Сахарный диабет. – 2004. – № 2. – С. 54–59.
2. Вейнингер О. Пол и характер. – М. : Астрель, 2012.
3. Дерягин Г. Б. Педофилия: пояснение для посторонних // Сексология и сексопатология. – 2006. – № 2. – С. 37–46.
4. Кон И. С. Социологическая психология. – М. ; Воронеж : МОДЭК.– 1999.
5. Колбасин В. В. Педофилия как юридический термин (криминальная педофилия) // Правовая парадигма. – 2021. – Т. 20. – № 2. – С. 169–174.
6. Крупин В. Н. Эректильная импотенция при сердечно-сосудистых заболеваниях. Диагностика. Лечение : автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. – 1995.
7. Новиков А. И., Михайлинчеко В. В., Родыгин Л. М. Первый опыт лечения больных с эректильной дисфункцией уденаф // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. – 2010. – № 2. – С. 131.
8. Педофилия: социально-правовые и медицинские аспекты / С. В. Шпорт, М. Ю. Каменсков, Г. Е. Введенский [и др.] // Общественное здоровье. – 2022. – Т. 2. – № 4. – С. 45–57.
9. Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) 2020 guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of paraphilic disorders // World J Biol Psychiatry.– 2020.– Vol. 21.– No. 6.– Р. 412–490.
10. Cavan D. A., Bamett A. H., Leatherdale B. A. Diabetic impotence: risk factors in a clinic population // Diabetes Res.– 1987. – No. 5.– Р.145–148.
11. Fedoroff J. P. More Puzzles: A Response to Seto’s “The Puzzle of Male Chronophilias” // Arch Sex Behav.– 2018.– Vol. 47.– No. 8.– Р. 2171–2173. .
12. Fedoroff J. P. The Paraphilias. Changing Suits in the Evolution of Sexual Interest Paradigms. – New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020.
13. Grundmann D., Krupp J., Scherner G., Amelung T., Beier K. M. Stability of Self-Reported Arousal to Sexual Fantasies Involving Children in a Clinical Sample of Pedophiles and Hebephiles // Arch Sex Behav. – 2016.– No. 45 (5).– Р. 1153–1162.
14. Krueger R. B., Reed G. M., First M. B., Marais A., Kismodi E., Briken P. Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD 11) // Arch Sex Behav. – 2017. – No. 46 (5) – Р. 1529–1545.
15. Leedom U., Procci W. P., Don D., Meehan W. P. Sexual dysfunction and depression in diabetic women // Diabetes. – 1986. – Vol. 35 (Suppl. 1). – Р. 23A.
16. Reed G. M., Drescher J., Krueger R.B., Atalla E., Cochran S. D., First M. B., Cohen-Kettenis P. T., Arango-de Montis I., Parish S. J., Cottler S., Briken P., Saxena S. Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD 11: revising the ICD 10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations // World Psychiatry. – 2016. – No. 15 (3). – Р 205–221.
17. Schiavi P. C, Hogan B. Sexual problems in diabetes mellitus: psychological aspects // Diabetes Care. – 1979. – Vol. 2. – Р. 9–17.
18. Seto M.C. Pedophilia and Sexual Offending Against Children. Theory, Assessment, and Intervention. – Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2018.
19. Thibaut F., Cosyns P., Fedoroff J. P., Briken P., Goethals K., Bradford J. M. W. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) 2020 guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of paraphilic disorders // The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – Р. 604–655.
20. Whitehead E. D., Myde B. J., Zussman S., Wayne N., Shinbach K., Davis D. Male sexual dysfunction and diabetes mellitus // New York State J Med. – 1983. – No. 83. – Р. 1174–1179.
21. Wulsin L. R., Jacobson A. M., Rand L. l. Psychosocial aspects of diabetic retinopathy // Diabetes Care. – 1987. – Vol. 10. – Р. 367–373.
Review
For citations:
Serednev V.A. A Philosophical and Legal Analysis of the Specifics of Female Pedophilia (Paraphilia) in the Context of Modern Medical, Psychological and Legal Paradigms. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2026;11(1):114-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2026-1-114-121
JATS XML









