Preview

ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY

Advanced search

Implementation of International Treaties and Problems of Fragmentation of International Law

https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2024-4-164-175

Abstract

The article attempts to study the specifics of the implementation of international treaties and the problem of fragmentation of international law. The impact of international law on national law is carried out through various mechanisms and procedures within each State. These mechanisms and procedures make it possible to bring national legislation into line with international norms and obligations. Without such coordination of international and national law, the effective implementation of international obligations becomes difficult. The research methodology uses general scientific research methods - historical and logical, analysis and synthesis; private scientific methods - logical-formal, comparative-legal, system analysis. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of the implementation of international treaties and the problems of fragmentation of international law. It is concluded that the mechanism of implementation of international treaties on the national territory depends on the internal legal order of each state. In most cases, for the implementation of an international treaty, national legislation must be consistent with its provisions. The specific procedures and formalities may vary depending on the domestic legislation of each State. Preventing fragmentation in the field of international law is a difficult task due to the need to achieve coordination and establish cooperation between international courts, relevant national structures, as well as States. This process requires an integrated and interrelated approach aimed at ensuring uniformity and consistency in the application of international legal norms. To achieve this goal, measures such as strengthening coordination and information exchange between different bodies, using stable norms and precedents, and maintaining an open and constructive dialogue between them can be taken.

About the Author

R. R. Garagurbanli
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student 

34 B. Cheremushkinskaya Street, 117218, Moscow



References

1. Бахин С. В. Правовые проблемы договорной унификации // Московский журнал международного права. – 2002. – № 1. – С. 129–143.

2. Залоило М. В. Фрагментация как современная тенденция развития правового пространства // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 27–49.

3. Имплементация решений Европейского Суда по правам человека в российской правовой системе: монография / Т. Я. Хабриева, А. Я. Капустин, А. И. Ковлер и др.; под общ. Ред. В. В. Лазарева – М. : ИЗиСП : Норма : Инфра-М, 2019.

4. Кочев В. А. Договорные источники международного права / В. А. Кочев, П. А. Ромашов // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 52–55.

5. Кузнецова О. А. Общепризнанные нормы и принципы международного права в гражданском праве: от перечня к системе // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 77–81.

6. Логвинова И. В. Проблемы реализации международных обязательств РФ // Социально-политические науки. – 2018. – № 5. – С. 90–93.

7. Лукашук И. И. Современное право международных договоров: в 2 т. – Т 1. – М. : Волтерс Клувер, 2004.

8. Международное правосудие как фактор интеграции: монография / Т. Я. Хабриева, А. И. Ковлер, А. М. Белялова и др.; отв. ред. Т. Я. Хабриева, А. И. Ковлер; предисл. В. М. Лебедева. – М. : ИЗиСП : Норма : Инфра-М, 2019.

9. Нефедова Ю. Ю. Основные доктринальные подходы к определению общепризнанности // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 145–152.

10. Сальвиа де М. Европейская Конвенция по правам человека. – СПб., 2004. - С. 66–67.

11. Тиунов О. И., Каширкина А. А., Морозов А. Н. Международные межведомственные договоры Российской Федерации / под ред. О. И. Тиунова : монография. – М. : Ин-т законодательства и сравнит. правоведения при Правительстве Рос. Федерации. – М., 2008.

12. Biukovic L. Dispute resolution mechanisms and regional trade agreements: South American and Caribbean modalities // U. C. Davis Journal of International Law and Politics. – 2007. – № 14. – Р. 193–219.

13. Higgins R. Respecting the sovereign states and the running a tight court-room // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. – 2001. – № 50. – Р. 121–132.

14. Romano C. P. R. The shift from the consensual to the compulsory paradigm in international adjudication: elements for a theory of consent // New York Journal of International Law and Politics. – 2007. – Vol. 39. – № 4. – P. 791–872.

15. Teitel R., Howse R. Cross-judging: tribunalization in a fragmented but interconnected legal order // New-York Journal of International Law and Politics. – 2009. – Vol. 41. – № 4. – P. 950–981.


Review

For citations:


Garagurbanli R.R. Implementation of International Treaties and Problems of Fragmentation of International Law. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2024;9(4):164-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2024-4-164-175

Views: 147


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-118X (Print)