Modern Features of the Omission and Restoration of the Limitation Periods in Civil Proceedings
Abstract
The limitation period, as a legal institution, is intended to discipline the participants in legal relations in matters of timeliness of making payments and fulfilling obligations, as well as applying for judicial resolution of arising disputes. In exceptional cases, when the court recognizes a valid reason for missing the limitation period due to circumstances related to the personality of the plaintiff, the violated right shall be protected. The article examines the general provisions on the statute of limitations in civil proceedings, and also considers the consequences of missing the statute of limitations. Revealed valid reasons under which the limitation period can be restored. The author includes the following factors as such: long-term and severe illness; illiteracy; helpless state. It is noted that the exact list of valid reasons is not indicated in the law. In this case, the decision on the issue lies with the judge and depends only on his discretion. The article also indicates that, unlike the suspension, the interruption in the course of the deadline entails its re-counting. The conclusion contains generalizing conclusions and proposals for solving the identified problems, in particular, it is proposed to determine the circle of persons who have the right to declare the application of the limitation period at the legislative level. The subject of the research was the regulatory legal acts, procedural aspects regulating the consequences of missing the statute of limitations in the civil process of the Russian Federation. The work used the method of generalization, dialectical method, logical method, system analysis method, formal legal and comparative legal methods. The scientific novelty of the research is largely due to its subject matter, purpose, objectives and is manifested, first of all, in a comprehensive study of the consequences of missing the statute of limitations in civil proceedings. Elements of novelty are also manifested in the conclusions formulated from the results of the research conducted in the article.
Keywords
About the Author
M. G. BalakinaRussian Federation
Master Student of the Faculty of Distance Learning of the PRUE.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
References
1. Грось Л. А. К Вопросу о сроках в материальном и процессуальном праве // Юрист, 2005. -№ 10. - С. 35-41.
2. Ибрагимова Л. Р. Порядок списания кредиторской задолженности с истекшим сроком исковой давности // Вестник науки. - 2020. - Т. 3. - № 1 (22). - С. 106-109.
3. Кириллова М. Я., Крашенинников П. В. Сроки в гражданском праве. Исковая давность. -М., 2015.
4. Терехова Л. А. Новые и вновь открывшиеся обстоятельства в гражданском и административном судопроизводстве : монография. - М. : Проспект, 2017.
Review
For citations:
Balakina M.G. Modern Features of the Omission and Restoration of the Limitation Periods in Civil Proceedings. ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY. 2020;(4):91-96. (In Russ.)