<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eclasoc</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">ЭКОНОМИКА. ПРАВО. ОБЩЕСТВО</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ECONOMICS. LAW. SOCIETY</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2411-118X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБОУ ВО «РЭУ им. Г.В. Плеханова»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">eclasoc-260</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ И ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CIVIL AND BUSINESS LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Проблема злоупотребления правом в сфере международного частного права</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Problem of Misuse of Rights in the Private International Law Sphere</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кауракова</surname><given-names>М. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kaurakova</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат юридических наук, член Российской ассоциации международного права</p><p>119019, Москва, ул. Знаменка, д. 10</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD of Law, Member of the Russian Association of International Law</p><p>10 Znamenka Str., Moscow, 119019</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">maria.kaurakova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская ассоциация международного права</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Association of International Law</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>05</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>104</fpage><lpage>109</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кауракова М.В., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кауракова М.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kaurakova M.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://epo.rea.ru/jour/article/view/260">https://epo.rea.ru/jour/article/view/260</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью данной статьи является пересмотр и ограничение сферы действия концепции свободы волеизъявления, широко развитой во всех без исключения правопорядках, с целью защиты публичных и частных прав лиц, которым ее реализация в эпоху глобализации наносит зачастую непоправимый вред. Для ее достижения необходимо 1) раскрыть особенности реализации концепции свободы волеизъявления в частноправовой сфере; 2) проанализировать особенности реализации социальных договоров, участниками которых являются физические лица и государства; 3) дать оценку возможности и необходимости отказа от таких социальных договоров посредством подчинения правоотношений иностранному праву и юрисдикции; 4) проанализировать последствия такого отказа от социальных договоров; 5) дать конкретные предложения по решению проблемы злоупотребления правом в сфере международного частного права.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>To reconsider and limit the concept of freedom of volition advanced in all states in the way meeting interests of public and private law subjects suffering huge losses due to its implementation in the era of globalization is the main end of the present paper. To meet this end it is necessary to 1) uncover particulars of this concept in a private law sphere; 2) to consider details of social contracts between physical persons and states; 3) to evaluate possibility and necessity to undo social contracts by submission of legal relations to foreign law and jurisdiction; 4) to analyze consequences of this undoing; 5) to give proposals to cope with this problem of misuse of rights in the private international law sphere.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>международное частное право</kwd><kwd>злоупотребление правом</kwd><kwd>социальный договор</kwd><kwd>правовой статус</kwd><kwd>субъект права</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>private international law</kwd><kwd>misuse of rights</kwd><kwd>social contract</kwd><kwd>legal status</kwd><kwd>subject of law</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Austin J. Lectures on Jurisprudence of the Philosophy of Positive Law. – London, 1869.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Austin J. Lectures on Jurisprudence of the Philosophy of Positive Law. – London, 1869.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bar L. V. The Theory and Practice of Private International Law. – Edinburgh : William Green &amp; Sons Law Publishers, 1892.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bar L. V. The Theory and Practice of Private International Law. – Edinburgh : William Green &amp; Sons Law Publishers, 1892.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bastiat F. La Loi. – Paris : Librairie de Guillaumin Et Cet, 1850.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bastiat F. La Loi. – Paris : Librairie de Guillaumin Et Cet, 1850.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cole G. D. H. Social Theory. – London : Methuen &amp; Co. LTD, 1920.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cole G. D. H. Social Theory. – London : Methuen &amp; Co. LTD, 1920.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ehrenzweig A. A. Choice of Law: Current Doctrine and True Rules // California Law Review. 1961. – Vol. 49. – Issue 2. – P. 240–253.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ehrenzweig A. A. Choice of Law: Current Doctrine and True Rules // California Law Review. 1961. – Vol. 49. – Issue 2. – P. 240–253.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Juenger F. K. General Course on Private International Law // Recueil des Cours, 1986.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Juenger F. K. General Course on Private International Law // Recueil des Cours, 1986.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kant I. The Philosophy of Law. An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right. – Edinburgh : T. &amp; T. Clark, 1887, 265 .</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kant I. The Philosophy of Law. An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right. – Edinburgh : T. &amp; T. Clark, 1887, 265 .</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lorenzen E. G. Theory of Qualifications and the Conflict of Laws // Columbia Law Review. 1920. – Vol. XX. – N 3. – Р. 247–282.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lorenzen E. G. Theory of Qualifications and the Conflict of Laws // Columbia Law Review. 1920. – Vol. XX. – N 3. – Р. 247–282.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rousseau J.-J. Du Contract Social, ou Principes du Droit Politique. – Paris : Imprimerie De Chaingnieau Aine, 1816.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rousseau J.-J. Du Contract Social, ou Principes du Droit Politique. – Paris : Imprimerie De Chaingnieau Aine, 1816.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wharton F. A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws or Private International Law. – Rochester, N.Y. : The Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishers Co., 1905.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wharton F. A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws or Private International Law. – Rochester, N.Y. : The Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishers Co., 1905.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
